If you’re new to this series, please read the introduction to building a solid analytics foundation before continuing.
The characteristics of a low technical readiness and high cultural readiness (low-high) organization are summarized below. Remember that this isn’t a judgement, a grade or a level. This is just a convenient label for describing where an organization might start in its quest to implement predictive analytics.
Based on our experience with customers starting from this state, we believe that an effective approach to becoming predictive practitioners is to leverage the existing belief in data by using the minimal technology needed to show how meaningful progress can be made. This is shown schematically in figure 1 below.
One of the more challenging aspects of harnessing data analytics is to build belief that such things are needed – If we have gotten along all this time without it, why do we need it now? Instead of fighting that inertia, organizations starting from low-high are able to use the sentiment that data is important to their advantage. This means such organizations can focus on understanding the mechanics of how to make technology useful rather than on the cultural battle of changing hearts and minds.
The first step is to identify and deploy the minimum set of analytics technologies which let the organization show that progress can be made. As in the low-low case, this is not the time to invest in the latest-and-greatest, cutting edge, highly customizable, data scientist-focused technology. With that kind of power and flexibility comes a very steep learning curve. For a low technology readiness organization, deferring the steep part of that learning curve is important. Getting quick wins using simpler, standard functionalities are key to showing feasibility. Some characteristics of analytics tools to look for is that they:
Once the tools are in place, the next step is to adopt practices that ensure at least one operations team uses this technology to openly engage data in their daily work. These daily meetings can achieve two things needed for success:
As experience with acting on data-driven findings grows and as people see that their beliefs about the utility of data were right, it becomes important to shift the emphasis from celebration to answering the question: “how do we expand usage of the technology to other groups and lines?” This means engaging management on specific technical or workflow related shortcomings that the daily meetings have surfaced. Questions like these can help: “Which techniques and tools are working? Which are not working and why? What usability factors are hampering adoption by certain groups or in certain areas of the plant? What reporting functions and integrations are missing which would make the findings fit more naturally into the existing workflows?” With experiences that reinforce the belief that data adds value and with a list of technical capabilities that would make people even more effective at using data, the organization has a solid foundation for pursuing more demanding or complicated analysis capabilities. At the end of this process, the executives should see that their beliefs in data were justified and that the existing teams can implement technology – the only question should be how to make that happen everywhere in the organization.
By choosing Falkonry’s time series AI as part of the basic technology deployed for this work, your operations teams will get software that is simple to deploy and that enables non-data specialists to work independently. This combination of traits and the Intelligence-first approach that it enables helps the organization learn the “how” of making analytics happen so that they can expand that “how” quickly and effectively.